I can't prove a flow worked after the run history disappears
A Power Automate maker needs to prove a flow ran, what it changed, or why it failed after the normal run-history view no longer has the evidence. The pain is durable proof for any operational flow, not the existing approval-specific 28/30-day timeout problem.
Blocker
Reviewed by Helen Jones
Reviewed by Helen JonesContext
The blocker, in a nutshell
If this blocker is unfamiliar, start here.
Power Automate records flow runs for troubleshooting, but that history is not a permanent audit trail. If a process owner needs to prove that a flow ran, captured the right data, or skipped something, they need a separate proof pattern before the run-history window or missing-run issue becomes the only evidence.
Key Terms
Industry jargon explained
Click any term to see its definition.
The Reality
A day in their life
Operations coordinator or finance power user who owns a flow people ask about later
I start with a small win: the flow has been doing its job quietly for weeks. It forwards the right emails, updates the SharePoint list, and nobody has had to chase the task manually.
Then a manager asks whether a specific item was processed last month. I open Power Automate expecting to prove it from run history, but the run is gone or not where I expected. I still have clues, but not a clean record.
By lunch I am piecing together evidence from an email timestamp, a SharePoint modified date, and a file that looks like it was created by the flow. It is enough to make a guess, but not enough to feel confident.
What I want is a simple proof log the flow writes while it runs: when it started, what item it handled, what it changed, whether it succeeded or failed, and where the evidence lives. Then run history can be useful for troubleshooting without being the only record the business depends on.
The People
Who experiences this blocker
Operations coordinator or finance power user who owns a flow people ask about later
28-55 • Beginner to intermediate maker
Skills
Power Automate basics
SharePoint list tracking
Outlook and Teams process support
Status reporting
Frustrations
- Run history is missing or expired when the question arrives
- The business effect exists but the flow evidence is hard to prove
- Manual exports and screenshots are easy to forget
Goals
- Keep a durable record of every important run
- Show success, failure, and changed records without opening old runs
- Know what evidence a flow should write while it runs
Manager or process owner
Asks whether the flow ran and expects a simple answer with evidence, not a forensic reconstruction.
Also affected by this blocker. Often shares the same frustrations or creates additional pressure.
Top Objections
- I do not need a full compliance system
- I only want enough proof for this business process
- I am not a Dataverse admin
How They Talk
Use These Words
run historyflow runprooflogSharePoint liststatussuccessfailureemail sent
Avoid
observability platformretention architectureforensic loggingSIEM
Learning Pathway
Power Automate Proof Logging
Make flow outcomes provable after run history is gone.
Showing 2 of 2 recommendations
Course
Start Here
Course Built
◆◆◆◆◆Excellent Fit
Diagnose and Prove Power Automate Flow Behaviour
6 lessons120 minbeginner
You'll build: A completed Flow Evidence Pack for one Power Automate flow, including source-event proof, run-history and sample-output capture, trigger/action/data-shape diagnosis, duplicate or missing-field classification, chosen repair/escalation path, controlled test matrix, and durable proof-log recommendation.
Includes: Flow Evidence Pack template · Run History Capture Checklist · Source Event Proof Sheet · Data Shape and Dynamic Content Map · Controlled Test Matrix · Proof Log Starter Schema
Run historyTrigger diagnosisDynamic content and data shape+3 more
Briefing
Briefing Built
◆◆◆◆◆Excellent Fit
Power Automate Run History Is Not Your Audit Trail
You'll build: A run-history proof decision: what the maker can trust from run history, what needs a separate proof log, and what must be escalated to an admin or compliance owner.
Run history retentionMissing runsDataverse FlowRun limits+2 more
Root Cause
Finding where this blocker actually starts
We traced backward through five layers of "why" until we hit the source. Here's what's really driving this.
1
Why can't the maker prove the flow worked?
Because the evidence they expected to inspect later is missing from run history or has aged out.
2
Why does that happen?
Microsoft documents a default 28-day run-history retention window, and user reports show some runs can be absent or hard to find even inside that window.
3
Why is this a business problem?
The business asks for proof of a sent email, copied record, forwarded file, or failed action after the troubleshooting record is no longer enough.
4
Why does it persist?
Makers often build the happy-path automation first and only add durable logging after a dispute, audit question, or missing-run incident.
5
Why is normal run history being treated as the proof system?
The flow was built to complete the task, not to create a durable business evidence trail, so the only proof lives in a platform troubleshooting record with retention and visibility limits.
Root Cause
The root cause is using transient run history as the only proof surface for a business process that may need evidence after the retention window or after run-history ingestion issues.
The Numbers
How this stacks up
Key metrics that determine the opportunity value.
Overall Impact Score
83/100
Urgency
8/10
They need this fixed now
Build Difficulty
9/10
Complex, needs deep expertise
Market Size
6/10
Healthy demand exists
Competition Gap
8/10
Major gap in the market
"I can run a flow and see that the process ran, but it doesn't show that is ran in the report history"
More Evidence
What others are saying
"there is no history shown even though I have proof ran multiple times in the last 28-days"
Practitioner needed to troubleshoot intermittent flow behaviour but run history was not logged. — Reddit r/PowerAutomate, 2026-03-05
"This history is only for 28 days, then after it automatically deletes"
Older practitioner demand for automatically saving run history beyond the normal window. — Stack Overflow, 2021-05-20
The Landscape
What solutions exist today?
Current market solutions and where there are opportunities.
Leader
P
Power Automate run history
Approach: Inspect recent flow runs and troubleshoot missing history.
Pricing: Included with Power Automate access
Weakness: Default retention is limited and does not replace a business evidence register.
M
Manual CSV/export or screenshots
Approach: Manually capture history before it expires.
Pricing: Free but manual
Weakness: Easy to forget, incomplete, and not tied to the process record unless designed deliberately.
C
Custom SharePoint/Dataverse log
Approach: Write run evidence into a durable table/list while the flow executes.
Pricing: Depends on storage/licensing
Weakness: Requires design choices around fields, permissions, retention, and error handling.
The Fix
What a solution needs to succeed
The non-negotiables and nice-to-haves for any product or service tackling this blocker.
The 3 Wishes
A lightweight flow proof log that captures business evidence at runtime so run history is not the only record.
Must Have
Define what must be proven for the process
Write a start/success/failure log row
Store input ID and output evidence link
Capture error branch details
Make the log readable by the process owner
Nice to Have
Retention label or review date
Simple dashboard by status
Template for common SharePoint/email flows
Out of Scope
Full compliance archive
Tenant-wide monitoring platform
Replacing Power Platform admin analytics
Guaranteeing every historical run can be recovered
Success Metrics
A test run creates a readable proof row
A failed run creates an error proof row
A manager can answer what happened without opening Power Automate run history
The proof boundary and retention rule are documented
Solution Strategy
Which approach fits you?
A briefing could explain retention, but the main bottleneck is implementing a small evidence log in one flow. A build spec is not earned unless later evidence shows repeated demand for a monitoring app.
What we recommend
Create one atomic course focused on adding a proof log to one operational flow.
For Creators
Content Ideas
Marketing hooks, SEO keywords, and buying triggers to help you create content around this blocker.
Buying Triggers
Events that make people search for solutions
- A manager asks whether the flow ran weeks later
- Run history is missing or expired
- A flow creates business-side effects but no durable record
- The team needs proof before trusting the automation
Content Angles
Attention-grabbing hooks for your content
- Power Automate run history is not your audit trail
- What to log before run history disappears
- How to prove a flow sent the email or updated the item
- Build a simple proof log for business flows
Search Keywords
What people type when looking for solutions
Power Automate run history disappearsPower Automate run history 28 daysPower Automate flow ran not showing run historyPower Automate audit log SharePoint flowPower Automate proof log
The Evidence
Where this came from
Every claim in this report is backed by public sources. Verify anything.
1.2.3.4.5.
Flows are running, but are not showing up in the run history
learn.microsoft.com
Flow working intermittently and not logging any history so I can't check it
reddit.com
Power Automate Run History
stackoverflow.com
Missing runs or triggers history for a flow
learn.microsoft.com
Understand the benefits of using solution-aware cloud flows
learn.microsoft.com
5 sources referenced
Source note
Blocker published by Collab365 Spaces, reviewed by Helen Jones on . Cite as "I can't prove a flow worked after the run history disappears", Collab365 Spaces. 5 sources referenced.
Have a question or correction?
No comments yet